The article shows that many situations men talk more than women do where they instill dominance in issues of different scenarios. Men usually want to ensure their points are taken on point in interviews taken. This is reflected in the study done in New Zealand where it was established that men control more of the talking time. This article shows that men talk more compared to women in public like official meetings, seminars, or tasks activities. It shows that men are more concerned with their status compared to women (Holmes, 2006). The article highlights that women do talk more than men in other situations do especially where they use talk to develop personal relationships, where women can make connections rather than proving points to the public. Women talk more about family and when in the majority. It seems that women talk more depending on their context (Karpf, 2006)
In the article, “The Party Line” by Rachael Rafelman (2006) it shows that women generally want to be heard where listening to them is an integral part of the girl talk due to reciprocal communication and women folk require this from each other. This article states that men are boring when both women and men are engaged in the same conversation, but women seem interesting than their male counterparts. Men enjoy talking about business and avoid personal stuff. Women in conversation look for ways to connect where women prefer disclosure of details when men do not disclose personal information easily (Rafelman, 2006).
The article by Rafelman (2006) speaks about how women are traditionally designed to keep conversations going in traditional female social functions. Where women draw people out and enable people to talk about themselves. It highlights that women capabilities are undermined where they are not celebrated. Women’s speech intends to be soft in conversations, and this is due to their nature. In this article of “the Party