Creativity a literature review

5

1250

However, both definitions aren’t accurate enough to describe the main two forms of creativity: the creative problem-solving and the role of social appraisal of judgment. So which to speak it itself is known as a multi-componential perspective. For instance, creativity that is seen from a human being is due to the interaction of the environment and the person his/herself. As an ongoing chain, even that isn’t the true understanding of what creativity is. So as a couple of definitions , both Batey M. and Furnham A. believed it was the following: 1. Attributes of the inventive novel and useful to a particular social/cultural group. 2. Attributes to the person who came up with the idea of the product. 3. Attributes of the person assessing the creativity of the product and 4. Attributes of the environment including the following: source of evaluation, source of support, of resources, and the source of stimulation inspirable. The main target of how to establish the individual differences was in personality traits and intelligence. Testing personality has interacted a relationship of creativity and extraversion, openness to knowledge, and conscientiousness. When studying the creative intelligence, tests found weak relationship to psychometric intelligence. Convergent thinking is to come in or bring together while divert thinking is to turn aside from one course to another, to amuse. Studies have rated creativity to measures of intelligence to find that there were non-significant relationships. When you score quality aspects of creative answers, you get hypothesizes and tests that must be run multiple times and from there use different methods such as the following: FFM (Five Factor Model), IB (Ideational Behavior), and RIBS (Runco Ideational Behavior Scale