Drawing on social scientific source material avalable on identity difference and diversity discuss the above statement in relation to how you believe such identification processes have shaped your own identity and social relationships

of individuals, it is very important to understand how people undergo the process of formation of their identities within the complex network of social interactions. As a basic ground for our effort to clarify this issue we may take the following definition of identity: ". . . identity is about belonging, about what you have in common with some people and what differentiates you from others. At most basic, it gives you sense of personal location, the stable core to your individuality. it is also about your social relationships, your complex involvement with others" (Weeks 1996, p.24). What seems to be the most characteristic of this definition is that it reconciles two apparently distinct spheres – personal and social. With this definition and available social scientific material in mind, I will try to relate relevant examples of my own experience to the quote, and in the process to better understand which factors have contributed to the formation of my identity.
First of all, as we have mentioned the complexity of the social structure of modern societies, it is necessary to emphasise which social factors actually create such a complexity. For this purpose we can employ several relevant sociological concepts. One of them is the notion of social diversity, based on the recognition of the fact that needs and priorities of people are equally shaped by our internal motivations and by our inevitable relation to other people. The recognition of the consequences of social diversity significantly widens the potential scope of concerns of individuals, because it suggests that, as statuses of social groups shift, relationships between them change as well. In this way, the inclusion of social diversity into the picture of social reality helps us see how interaction between individuals and larger social formations may constantly generate potential for changes, which in their turn greatly increase the number of life options available for us (Sullivan 2000). Now, in the