PPOL505_Annotated_Bibliography_Grading_Rubric31

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content (70%) Advanced 92-100% Proficient 84-91% Developing 1-83% Not present Total Policy Focus 9.25 to 10 points The focus is the specific, well-defined policy and based on the research question. 8.5 to 9 points The policy focus is well-defined for the most part. 1 to 8.25 points The policy is not specific, clear, or defined. It needs to be revised for focus. 0 points Not present Articles Chosen 18.5  to 20 points Contains 8 true peer-reviewed research articles from scholarly sources. 17 to 18 points Contains at least 8 articles, 7 of which are peer-reviewed research articles from scholarly sources. 1 to 16.5 points Contains only 6 or fewer true peer-reviewed research articles from scholarly sources. 0 points Not present Article Summaries 36.5 to 40 points Article summaries are clear and focused. They highlight the significant parts of each article. The student understands and clearly recounts, in his or her own words, the central thesis of each article. 33.5 to 36.25 points Article summaries are clear and focused for the most part. The student can recount the central thesis of each article. 1 to 33.0 points Article summaries need strengthening and revision. They are not comprehensive in their overviews of each article. 0 points Not present Structure (30%) Advanced 92-100% Proficient 84-91% Developing 1-83% Not present Total Spelling and Grammar 18.5 to 20 points No grammatical or spelling errors 17 to 18 points Some errors, but not distracting from the appearance and presentation of ideas. 1 to 16.5 points Significant errors such that the professionalism and appearance of the paper are significantly undermined. 0 points Not present Formatting 9.25 to 10 points The analysis meets the formatting requirements set forth in the assignment instructions. Assignment adheres to current Turabian guidelines. Citations are formatted correctly. Each of the 8 article summaries contain 200-250 words. 8.5 to 9 points The analysis meets some, but not all of the formatting requirements set forth in the assignment instructions. Assignment mostly adheres to current Turabian guidelines. Citations are formatted correctly. 5-7 of the 8 article summaries contain 200-250 words. 1 to 8.25 points The analysis does not follow the assignment instructions. Essay is not formatted according to Turabian formatting. Citations are not formatted correctly. Less than 5 of the 8 article summaries contain 200-250 words. 0 points Not present Professor Comments: Total: